You need to be signed in to add your comment.

You cannot leave comment in this blogpost unless you are a part of the project panel.

Board and Commission Appointments

This discussion topic was requested by CM Sepulveda to discuss Board and Commission Appointments.

From CM Sepulveda: The Rules Committee is currently in the process of discussing procedures and processes for confirmation hearings. Here's a summary of the key points that were addressed during the special called meeting:

  1. Two-Week Time Change: A proposal was made to implement a two-week time change in the confirmation process. Under this suggestion, individuals would attend the Rules Committee for their confirmation hearings but the final vote by the entire council would be deferred until the subsequent meeting. Attendance at the following meeting would not be mandatory for nominees, providing council members with the opportunity to review confirmation hearings. This allows for a more thorough consideration of nominees.
  2. Board Priorities:  We will be sending out a communications to board and commission chairs, as well as department heads, to ensure the accuracy of data and to gather insights into their priorities. This approach aims to familiarize council members with the ongoing work of these entities, enabling us to make well-informed decisions when confirming nominees.
  3. Data and Questionnaire: Efforts are underway to obtain more accurate data, which will be further segmented by individual boards and commissions. Your input is welcome, and we are open to incorporating additional information or feedback on the questionnaire to enhance the overall quality of the confirmation process.
    <span class="translation_missing" title="translation missing: en-US.projects.forum_topics.show.load_comment_text">Load Comment Text</span>