General Forum, 2023-2027 Term

This is a forum for discussion by Councilmembers of topics relevant to the 2023-2027 Council term.

Only Councilmembers may participate in posting to this internet forum, pursuant to state law.

Please scroll down to view all discussion topics.

This is a forum for discussion by Councilmembers of topics relevant to the 2023-2027 Council term.

Only Councilmembers may participate in posting to this internet forum, pursuant to state law.

Please scroll down to view all discussion topics.

Discussions: All (65) Open (65)
  • You need to be signed in to add your comment.

    This discussion topic was requested by Council member Tasha Ellis to discuss RS2024-392, which approves a contract between the Metropolitan Government and Rite of Passage, Inc. for operation and management services for the Davidson County Juvenile Detention Facility. 

    From CM Ellis: 

    Has there been any follow up or report back from Rite of Passage addressing the high risk items flagged in the final audit report on Feb 7, 2024? Here's a a link to that report for reference:   https://www.nashville.gov/sites/default/files/2024-02/Audit-Report-Davidson-County-Juvenile-Court-240207.pdf?ct=1707333595

    This discussion topic was requested by Council member Tasha Ellis to discuss RS2024-392, which approves a contract between the Metropolitan Government and Rite of Passage, Inc. for operation and management services for the Davidson County Juvenile Detention Facility. 

    From CM Ellis: 

    Has there been any follow up or report back from Rite of Passage addressing the high risk items flagged in the final audit report on Feb 7, 2024? Here's a a link to that report for reference:   https://www.nashville.gov/sites/default/files/2024-02/Audit-Report-Davidson-County-Juvenile-Court-240207.pdf?ct=1707333595

    You need to be signed in to add your comment.

    You cannot leave comment in this blogpost unless you are a part of the project panel.

  • You need to be signed in to add your comment.



    This discussion topic was requested by CM Sepulveda to discuss Board and Commission Disclosures.

    From CM Sepulveda: 

    Colleagues I have an ordinance up that would require people serving on boards and commissions to file disclosures. This ordinance is very broad. It's meant to get the conversation going. I plan to defer. The amendment I have in mind would require them to state any conflict of interest. It was also suggested that this be limited to boards who approve loans or money. I think it's a good suggestion. Wanted to get feedback from everyone else.



    This discussion topic was requested by CM Sepulveda to discuss Board and Commission Disclosures.

    From CM Sepulveda: 

    Colleagues I have an ordinance up that would require people serving on boards and commissions to file disclosures. This ordinance is very broad. It's meant to get the conversation going. I plan to defer. The amendment I have in mind would require them to state any conflict of interest. It was also suggested that this be limited to boards who approve loans or money. I think it's a good suggestion. Wanted to get feedback from everyone else.

    You need to be signed in to add your comment.

    You cannot leave comment in this blogpost unless you are a part of the project panel.

  • You need to be signed in to add your comment.

    This discussion topic was requested by CM Sepulveda to discuss Board and Commission Appointments.

    From CM Sepulveda: The Rules Committee is currently in the process of discussing procedures and processes for confirmation hearings. Here's a summary of the key points that were addressed during the special called meeting:

    1. Two-Week Time Change: A proposal was made to implement a two-week time change in the confirmation process. Under this suggestion, individuals would attend the Rules Committee for their confirmation hearings but the final vote by the entire council would be deferred until the subsequent meeting. Attendance at the following meeting would not be mandatory for nominees, providing council members with the opportunity to review confirmation hearings. This allows for a more thorough consideration of nominees.
    2. Board Priorities:  We will be sending out a communications to board and commission chairs, as well as department heads, to ensure the accuracy of data and to gather insights into their priorities. This approach aims to familiarize council members with the ongoing work of these entities, enabling us to make well-informed decisions when confirming nominees.
    3. Data and Questionnaire: Efforts are underway to obtain more accurate data, which will be further segmented by individual boards and commissions. Your input is welcome, and we are open to incorporating additional information or feedback on the questionnaire to enhance the overall quality of the confirmation process.

    This discussion topic was requested by CM Sepulveda to discuss Board and Commission Appointments.

    From CM Sepulveda: The Rules Committee is currently in the process of discussing procedures and processes for confirmation hearings. Here's a summary of the key points that were addressed during the special called meeting:

    1. Two-Week Time Change: A proposal was made to implement a two-week time change in the confirmation process. Under this suggestion, individuals would attend the Rules Committee for their confirmation hearings but the final vote by the entire council would be deferred until the subsequent meeting. Attendance at the following meeting would not be mandatory for nominees, providing council members with the opportunity to review confirmation hearings. This allows for a more thorough consideration of nominees.
    2. Board Priorities:  We will be sending out a communications to board and commission chairs, as well as department heads, to ensure the accuracy of data and to gather insights into their priorities. This approach aims to familiarize council members with the ongoing work of these entities, enabling us to make well-informed decisions when confirming nominees.
    3. Data and Questionnaire: Efforts are underway to obtain more accurate data, which will be further segmented by individual boards and commissions. Your input is welcome, and we are open to incorporating additional information or feedback on the questionnaire to enhance the overall quality of the confirmation process.

    You need to be signed in to add your comment.

    You cannot leave comment in this blogpost unless you are a part of the project panel.

  • You need to be signed in to add your comment.

    This discussion topic was requested by Vice Mayor Angie Henderson to discuss missing middle housing. 

    From Vice Mayor Henderson: Missing Middle Housing. Why is it important; what does it look like; and where can it go? Nashville needs more diversity of housing types in more places. This is a forum for talking about triplexes, townhouses, cottage courts, and more.

    This discussion topic was requested by Vice Mayor Angie Henderson to discuss missing middle housing. 

    From Vice Mayor Henderson: Missing Middle Housing. Why is it important; what does it look like; and where can it go? Nashville needs more diversity of housing types in more places. This is a forum for talking about triplexes, townhouses, cottage courts, and more.

    You need to be signed in to add your comment.

    You cannot leave comment in this blogpost unless you are a part of the project panel.

  • You need to be signed in to add your comment.

    This discussion topic was requested by Vice Mayor Angie Henderson to discuss stormwater policy. 

    From Vice Mayor Henderson: Stormwater challenges are on the minds and lips of residents and homebuilders across the city. We have legislation pending regarding stormwater fees, and the results of a stormwater complaints assessment being presented to the Council on January 30. This is the forum for stormwater policy questions & suggestions.

    This discussion topic was requested by Vice Mayor Angie Henderson to discuss stormwater policy. 

    From Vice Mayor Henderson: Stormwater challenges are on the minds and lips of residents and homebuilders across the city. We have legislation pending regarding stormwater fees, and the results of a stormwater complaints assessment being presented to the Council on January 30. This is the forum for stormwater policy questions & suggestions.

    You need to be signed in to add your comment.

    You cannot leave comment in this blogpost unless you are a part of the project panel.

Page last updated: 15 Jul 2026, 01:35 PM